The Short Version
- Most grades: 4×100 on a 56 mm bore. 350 rows of them.
- The Cyborg ZR and the Lancer VR: 4×114.3 on a 67 mm bore. Same chassis code as the rest.
- Both the bolt circle and the bore change together. This is not a subtle difference.
- The database contradicts itself on one grade, and we are publishing that rather than picking a side.
The Top Grade Leaves the Family
The Mirage and the Lancer are the same car with different badges, and for most of the range the answer is simple: 4×100 with a 56 mm bore, on 5J×13 or 5.5J×14 at +46. That covers the 1.3 and 1.5 grades, the diesel, the base Cyborg and the Cyborg RX.
Then you reach the top of the 1.6-litre range and it changes completely:
| Chassis | Grade | Wheel | PCD | Holes | Bore |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GF-CJ1A | 3-door 1.3 M / J | 5J×13 +46 | 100 | 4 | 56 |
| GF-CJ4A | 3-door 1.6 Cyborg ZR | 6J×15 +46 | 114.3 | 4 | 67 |
| GF-CK4A | 4-door 1.6 VR | 6J×15 +46 | 114.3 | 4 | 67 |
| GF-CM5A | 4WD 1.8 GSR | 6J×15 +46 | 114.3 | 4 | — |
Twenty-four rows out of roughly four hundred. Everything else is 4×100.
Note that the hole count stays at four throughout. This is a four-lug car on a 114.3 mm circle at the top of the range — the same awkward pattern we found on the Primera and the C23 Serena. Sellers see four studs and assume 100 mm. On a Cyborg ZR they are wrong.
The Bore Moves Too
This is what makes the split unusually consequential. Most bolt-pattern changes leave the bore alone. Here it goes from 56 mm to 67 mm — eleven millimetres, a completely different hub.
So there is no partial compatibility. A base Mirage wheel will not go on a Cyborg ZR and a Cyborg ZR wheel will not go on a base Mirage. They are unrelated fitments on cars that look identical from ten feet away.
Where the Source Contradicts Itself
We found something we think is worth publishing openly, because it bears on how much weight anyone should put on a single database lookup.
Chassis GF-CK4A, the four-door 1.6, 6J×15 at +46 on 195/55R15, appears on two model pages of the same database:
- On the Mirage page, as grade VR — bore stated as 67 mm.
- On the Lancer page, as grade MR — bore stated as 56 mm.
Same chassis code. Same wheel. Same tyre. Both figures printed explicitly on individual grade pages, not truncated table cells. They cannot both be right.
We have no way to resolve it from the source, and we are not going to average two numbers or pick the one that suits us. If you own a CK4A VR or MR, measure your hub before buying wheels. Ten minutes with a caliper beats either of these figures — our reference explains the method.
The Earlier Cyborg Is Not Split
The original Cyborg and Cyborg R of the 1991–1995 CA/CB/CC/CD generation, with the 4G92 MIVEC, run the same 4×100 / 56 mm as the plainest base grade. No divergence at all.
So the split arrives with the later CJ/CK generation, at the very top of the range only. “Is a Cyborg 4×114.3” has two answers and the generation plus the exact grade decides.
The Cedia Adds a Third Pattern
For completeness, since owners run into it: the later CS-series Lancer Cedia has three fitments in one generation — base SE-G grades at 4×100, the CS6A Exceed at 4×114.3, and the CS5A Ralliart at 5×114.3 on 6J×16 +46. Five studs, finally.
The Lancer Evolution is a separate vehicle with its own hardware and we cover it in its own guides. Do not read Evolution figures across to any car on this page.
What We Could Not Verify
- Whether the CK4A VR/MR bore is 56 or 67 mm. The source states both.
- Bore for the CM5A 4WD GSR and the CS-series Cedia grades, which show as unresearched.
- Pre-1991 Mirage and Lancer. The database’s earliest rows start late 1991.
Seen on the road
Which wheels are you looking for? Tell us the wheel, the size and the fitment — send us a request and we will go and find it.
Wheel identification is taken from the hashtags the owner applied to their own post.